“Glory to Hong Kong” Injunction Ruling Will Be Made Next Week

Spread the love


A Hong Kong choose mentioned on Friday that he would rule subsequent week on a authorities request to ban a preferred pro-democracy tune from the web, in a case that might power Google and different corporations to limit entry to the tune.

At problem is “Glory to Hong Kong,” which was the anthem of the 2019 protests that ended with Beijing taking tighter management over Hong Kong. The authorities argue that the tune is an insult to China’s nationwide anthem and will make folks consider that Hong Kong is an impartial nation. The federal government has banned it from faculties and lashed out when it was performed, apparently by mistake, at sports activities competitions.

On Friday Decide Anthony Chan, after listening to three hours of authorized arguments, mentioned he would problem his choice on July 28. The federal government is looking for an injunction to ban the publication or distribution on-line of “Glory to Hong Kong.” Anybody violating the injunction might face jail for contempt of courtroom.

The case is being carefully watched by tech corporations, as a result of it has raised the specter of extra authorities management of on-line speech in Hong Kong.

“The enterprise group ought to take discover — the courts gained’t be capable to defend them so long as the Hong Kong authorities can plausibly declare that nationwide safety pursuits are in play,” mentioned Thomas E. Kellogg, the manager director of the Middle for Asian Legislation at Georgetown College.

Google has resisted the federal government’s public requests that “Glory to Hong Kong” not present up in search outcomes or on its sibling service, YouTube. However that might change if a courtroom ordered it to abide by the request. Like most tech corporations, Google has a coverage of eradicating or proscribing entry to materials that’s deemed unlawful by a courtroom in sure international locations or locations.

Google, which is owned by Alphabet, mentioned it will not touch upon the case, as did Meta, the mum or dad firm of Fb. Google and Fb established places of work in Hong Kong over a decade in the past, and at present every has as much as a number of hundred workers within the metropolis. Apple didn’t reply to requests for remark.

The authorities in Hong Kong have more and more cracked down on what they contemplate dissent and threats to nationwide safety, concentrating on people with arrests, bounties and prosecution.

On the identical time, the federal government is working to cross laws by early subsequent 12 months that might goal what it considers subversive content material and shut “web loopholes,” a transfer that might have extra far-reaching penalties and codify the ban into regulation.

Hong Kong has lengthy attracted overseas companies looking for entry and proximity to China, away from its censorship controls. It has been the one Chinese language territory with unfettered entry to providers comparable to Google and Fb, which pulled out of China years in the past.

When Google refused a request to take away the tune in December, Hong Kong’s safety chief referred to as the corporate’s choice “unthinkable.”

In courtroom on Friday, Benjamin Yu, a lawyer for the federal government arguing why the tune ought to be banned, mentioned it had been used to “fire up feelings.” He pointed to the arrest of a harmonica participant who had performed the tune outdoors the British consulate when mourning the loss of life of Queen Elizabeth II final 12 months.

Abraham Chan, a lawyer performing as pal of the courtroom to current opposing arguments, mentioned banning the tune due to nationwide safety might disrupt the free move of data.

“You’ll be able to’t merely say ‘Don’t fear concerning the chilling results,’” he mentioned.

The Hong Kong authorities have arrested greater than 250 folks beneath an expansive nationwide safety regulation Beijing imposed on town in 2020, geared toward stamping out opposition to the ruling Communist Get together.

In comparison with “slow-grinding” legal circumstances towards people, an injunction might give the federal government a fast path to proscribing content material on on-line platforms, mentioned Kevin Yam, a authorized researcher and former Hong Kong lawyer primarily based in Melbourne.

No firm or particular person was named as a direct defendant within the authorities’s injunction utility, which included 32 hyperlinks to “Glory to Hong Kong” on YouTube.

However many worry {that a} courtroom injunction towards “Glory to Hong Kong” may very well be a step towards extra official management over the web in Hong Kong, the place the web stays principally freed from censorship regardless of Beijing’s heavier hand in governing the territory.

American tech corporations like Fb and Twitter have been blocked from mainland China in 2009. A 12 months later, Google shut down its China providers and rerouted customers to its search engine in Hong Kong, then a bastion of political freedom on Chinese language soil.

For the reason that nationwide safety regulation was put in place, requests to tech corporations by the Hong Kong authorities to take away content material on the web have soared.

Chang Che contributed reporting from Seoul.


Spread the love

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top